| COLE RECAP Docket (Free): https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68546116/doe-v-northwestern-university/ |
United States District Court
Northern District of Illinois – CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1 (Chicago)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:24-cv-04125
Doe v. Northwestern University Assigned to: Honorable John Robert Blakey Cause: 42:1985 Civil Rights | Date Filed: 05/20/2024 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question |
| Plaintiff | ||
| John Doe | represented by | Jonathan David Lindenfeld Fegan Scott LLC 305 Broadway Ste 7th Floor New York, NY 10007 212-208-1489 Email: jonathan@feganscott.com LEAD ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paige L Smith Fegan Scott LLC 150 S. Wacker Dr. Ste 24th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 847-893-0783 Email: paige@feganscott.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Elizabeth A. Fegan Fegan Scott, LLC 150 S. Wacker Dr., 24th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 312-741-1019 Fax: Not a member Email: beth@feganscott.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED |
V. | ||
| Defendant | ||
| Northwestern University | ||
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2024 | 1 | COMPLAINT filed by John Doe; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21983709.(Fegan, Elizabeth) (Entered: 05/20/2024) |
| 05/20/2024 | 2 | CIVIL Cover Sheet (Fegan, Elizabeth) (Entered: 05/20/2024) |
| 05/20/2024 | 3 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Elizabeth A. Fegan (Fegan, Elizabeth) (Entered: 05/20/2024) |
| 05/20/2024 | 4 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Paige L Smith (Smith, Paige) (Entered: 05/20/2024) |
| 05/20/2024 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (jn,) (Entered: 05/20/2024) | |
| 05/20/2024 | CLERK’S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jn, ) (Entered: 05/20/2024) | |
| 05/21/2024 | 5 | MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-21987099.(Lindenfeld, Jonathan) (Entered: 05/21/2024) |
| 05/21/2024 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Northwestern University (vkm, ) (Entered: 05/21/2024) | |
| 05/21/2024 | 6 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Jonathan Lindenfeld’s motion for leave to appear pro hac vice 5 is granted. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. The litigants are ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court’s standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey’s information page on the Court’s official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. In addition, the parties must file a status report no later than 6/5/2024, using the model template set forth in this Court’s standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. During the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey’s Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at Gloria_Lewis@ilnd.uscourts.gov. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. Mailed notice (gel, ) (Entered: 05/21/2024) |